Skip to Main Content

K-12 Resources for Elementary and High School Students: Evaluate Sources

Information and links to freely available academic resources for younger people.

Evaluating Sources

As part of the third step in Information Literacy, when choosing sources, it is important for you to evaluate each one to ensure that you have the best quality source for your project.  
More information about Information Literacy.

Information Literacy Graphic
Here are questions for you to consider when evaluating your sources:

Author - Who is the source of the information?

CREDIBILITY, AUTHORITY, RELIABILITY, and VALIDITY

  • Who is responsible for the intellectual content within the resource?
  • Does the author provide contact information?
  • What are the author's credentials?
  • Where does the author work?
  • Where is the source published?
  • Is the publisher well known?
  • For web sites, who is sponsoring the web site?
  • For web sites, what is the domain (.com, .gov, .edu, etc.)?

Is it CLEAR?

A Guide to Source Evaluation

Credibility - refers to the reliability and trustworthiness of the source from which the information is obtained. It is essential to consider whether the author or publisher of the information has the necessary expertise and background to provide accurate and truthful content.

Language - involves the clarity and appropriateness of the language used in the information. An effective piece of information should be presented in a way that is easily understandable by the audience.

Audience - refers to the specific group of people for whom the information is intended. Understanding the target audience can help in evaluating whether the content is suitable and relevant to their needs and interests.

Relevance - pertains to how closely the information aligns with your specific needs or questions. In evaluating information, it is important to assess whether it contributes meaningfully to your understanding or decision-making process.

Evaluate Sources Worksheet

Content - How is the information written?

Is the information too vague or too specific?

ACCURACY

 

  • What are the author's research methods?
  • Does the author provide supportive evidence?
  • Have other scholars cited this author?
  • Is the information accurate, credible?
  • Are the spelling and grammar correct?
OBJECTIVITY

 

  • What are the goals and objectives of the author?
  • What is the purpose of the source? (To inform? To explain? To persuade? To advertise? Something else?)
  • Is the information within the source biased?
  • Why was the source created?
  • Who was the source created for? (ex. general population, other scholars, etc.)
  • For web sites, are there advertisements?
CURRENCY

 

  • How old is the information within the source?
  • When was the document produced?
  • When was the last time the source was updated?
  • For web sites, are the links alive or dead?

REACT Framework to Assess AI-Generated Tools for Academic Research

Relevance: Evaluate the tool's relevance to your specific needs and objectives. Consider whether the tool aligns with your goals and addresses your challenges effectively.

Ease of Use: Assess the tool's usability and user experience. Evaluate how easy it is to navigate the tool, perform tasks, and access its features. Consider factors such as intuitiveness, accessibility of functionalities, and clarity of instructions.

Assessing DEIA (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility): Evaluate the tool's performance in promoting diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusion. Consider whether the tool incorporates diverse perspectives, mitigates biases, and ensures equitable outcomes for all users, regardless of their background or abilities.

Currency: Examine the tool's currency in terms of its technology, data, and methodologies. Assess whether the tool utilizes the latest advancements in AI research, incorporates up-to-date datasets, and follows current best practices in generative modeling.

Transparency & Accuracy: Evaluating the tool's transparency and accuracy in its operations and decision-making process. Assess whether the tool provides clear insights into how it generates outputs, handles data, and makes predictions, as well as whether it consistently delivers precise and correct information. Look for transparency in the algorithms, data source, model limitations, and potential biases that may affect its performance.   

Basis of Information

What are the sources of information THEY used?

  • Theory
  • Primary or evidence-based research
  • Opinion
  • Editorial comments
  • Advice
  • Best practices

RADCAB

RADCAB is a mnemonic acronym for evaluating information created by Karen M. Christensson (http://www.radcab.com/​)
R = Relevancy

A = Appropriateness
D = Detail
C = Currency

A = Accuracy
B = Bias

Fake News?!?

Fake news and false information is widely spread on the Internet. How can you tell if what you are reading is real? Here are some sources to help: